As a company owned by its viewers thanks to the exhorbitant licence fee it should be the bastion of impartiality unfortunately the opposite is true. I just wish that the UK government had the guts to make it a commercial station and remove that ridiculous licence requirement.
i have to admit that i am bias against the BBC - i find it disgraceful that i am forced to buy a TV license to bankroll a station that, for many years, has not made anything i want to watch. I only watch sky these days - i admit i watch UK gold, (all the BBC repeats) i pay for that via sky and they show adverts. If i went to asda and paid £150 for my shopping they would not take it from me and put it back on the shelf once i have paid - With so many channels available to watch there should be an "opt out" option for people such as myself who are forced, by law, to "donate" vast sums of hard earned money to keep a company going who gives me nothing.
of a company that has lectured people about doing bad things like flying and carbon usage for years, regurgitates every pro global warming article with vigour, and then spends fortunes flying, or driving, their presenters from London, Scotland and wherever to Salford. And without a hint of shame. I've not taken them seriously for years because of their bias in every news report. Mind you the web site isn't bad...
They advertise all the time, they breach the licensing rules. The side with the criminal Israeli war crime government all the time. If we got rid on this unfair license and forced the BBC into a fair playing field, they just might get better.
As I stands I despise this Zionist war mongering racist scum #####.