For non-controversial topics, Wikipedia is pretty good.
For the big questions about prime reality (existence and nature of God, age of earth, evolution, etc.), Wikipedia pays lip service with articles discussing the topics; however, in reality it (a) fails to capture the best arguments and instead sets up straw men, and (b) makes assumptions about the "true answer" in many other articles. It has a goal of a neutral point of view, but doesn't come close.
Connect with Facebook to get one click access to Trustpilot. It's easier.Sign up with Facebook
You were not logged in with the entered details. Please try again.
Hi there, it looks like we're having trouble getting you logged in.
No worries though, our friendly support team will help get you back up and running as usual. Just get in touch.
Hi there, it looks like you still haven't activated your account.
No worries though, it's easy-- check your inbox for the email we just sent you, and click on the link.